Comparative study of the Effectiveness of the use of the universal tennis elbow splint compared to elbow brace in treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis


Tennis elbow
Lateral epicondylitis
Wrist splint
Forearm brace

How to Cite

Pote, D. U. B., Solge, A. ., Karpe, V. ., Ghare, M. A., & Thatte, A. A. (2020). Comparative study of the Effectiveness of the use of the universal tennis elbow splint compared to elbow brace in treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. VIMS Health Science Journal , 7(4), 118-124.


Background: Lateral epicondylitis is a serious condition affecting 1 to 3% of adult population between the age group of 30 to 50 year old. This group represents the working force and tennis elbow causes debilitating pain and patients are unable to perform the affected limb functions of lifting or holding anything. The main cause for tennis elbow is the tendinopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle (ECRB). There are multiple treatment measures to relieve the pain and bring back the function of the limb to normalcy as early as possible. The elbow brace is used to reduce the expansion of the ECRB and thereby reducing the symptoms of tennis elbow. It was hypothesized that wrist splints would reduce the activation of the ECRB muscle and thereby will reduce the symptoms of the tennis elbow. Streek et al performed a study using the wrist splint with 20-30 degrees extension and mentioned in limitations the changing the degree of extension may improve outcomes as compared to elbow braces. On that hypothesis we used a brace with only 5-10 degrees of extension. Aims: 1) To study the symptomatic and functional outcome of the elbow brace. 2) To study the symptomatic and functional outcome of the wrist splint. 3) To compare the symptomatic and functional outcomes between the wrist splint and the elbow brace. Material & Methods: The patients included in the study were divided into Group A receiving the wrist splint and group B elbow brace. The patient rated tennis elbow evaluation score (PRTEE), grip strength and pain visual assisted (VAS) score on the day of enrolment and 6 weeks after using either the elbow brace or wrist splint was noted. We used Mann-Whitney U test to calculate P-value intergroup and for P-value intra-group we used Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. Result: Group A distribution of median 6 weeks PRTEE score improved significantly compared to median baseline PRTEE score (P-value<0.001). The VAS score, grip strength and improvement in PRTEE score at 6 weeks is relatively better in Group A compared to Group B, however the difference did not reach statistical significance (P-value>0.05).Conclusion: The use of wrist splint significantly improved the symptoms of the tennis elbow. The outcome is comparable to use of tennis elbow brace. The outcome is not statistically significant if compared between the two groups.


Degen RM, Conti MS, Camp CL, Altchek DW, Dines JS, Werner BC. Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Lateral Epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85,318 Patients. HSS J. 2018. doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3.

Smidt N, Van Der Windt DAWM. Tennis elbow in primary care. Br Med J. 2006. doi:10.1136/bmj.39017.396389.BE.

Taylor SA, Hannafin JA. Evaluation and Management of Elbow Tendinopathy. Sports Health. 2012. doi:10.1177/1941738112454651


Kannus P, Jozsa L. Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon: A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1991. doi:10.2106/00004623-199173100-00009

Kraushaar B, Nirschl R. Current concepts review: tendinosis of the elbow (tennis elbow). J Bone Jt Surg. 1999.

Ahmad Z, Siddiqui N, Malik SS, Abdus-Samee M, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Rushton N. Lateral epicondylitis: A review of pathology and management. Bone Jt J. 2013. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.29285.

Duncan J, Duncan R, Bansal S, Davenport D, Hacker A. Lateral epicondylitis: The condition and current management strategies. Br J Hosp Med. 2019. doi:10.12968/hmed.2019.80.11.647.

Shiri, R., Viikari-Juntura, E., Varonen, H., & Heliövaara M (2006). Shiri, R., Viikari-Juntura, E., Varonen, H., & Heliövaara, M. (2006). Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. American journal of epidemiology, 164(11), 1065-1074. Am J Epidemiol. 2006. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj325.

Boyer MI, Hastings H. Lateral tennis elbow: “Is there any science out there?” J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1999;8(5):481-491. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90081-2.

Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med. 2005. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170.

Wolf JM, Ozer K, Scott F, Gordon MJV, Williams AE. Comparison of autologous blood, corticosteroid, and saline injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.05.014.

Haker E, Lundeberg T. Elbow-band, splintage and steroids in lateral epicondylalgia (tennis elbow). Pain Clin. 1993.

Van De Streek MD, Van Der Schans CP, De Greef MHG, Postema K. The effect of a forearm/hand splint compared with an elbow band as a treatment for lateral epicondylitis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(2):183-189. doi:10.1080/03093640408726703.

Garg R, Adamson GJ, Dawson PA, Shankwiler JA, Pink MM. A prospective randomized study comparing a forearm strap brace versus a wrist splint for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.015.

Rompe JD, Overend TJ, MacDermid JC. Validation of the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire. J Hand Ther. 2007;20(1):3-11. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003

Newcomer KL, Martinez-Silvestrini JA, Schaefer MP, Gay RE, Arendt KW. Sensitivity of the patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Ther. 2005;18(4):400-406. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.001

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Array


Download data is not yet available.