Comparative Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology & Computerised Cytology Scan In Diagnosis of Extra Thyroidal Neck Masses

Authors

  • Dr. Archana Buch
  • Dr. Tanmayi Kulkarni
  • Dr. Banyamen Iqbal
  • Dr. Vikas Kulkarni
  • Dr. Harsh Kumar

Keywords:

Extra thyroidal neck lesions, FNAC, Neck Swellings, CT scan

Abstract

Objective: the present study was carried out to compare the utility of Fine Needle Aspiration  Cytology (FNAC) Versus Computerised tomography (CT) scan in diagnosing extra thyroidal neck lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of both were calculated and analysed keeping histopathology as a gold standard. Material & Methods: the prospective study was conducted during July 2013 to September 2015 at a tertiary care hospital, Department of Pathology & Radiology. A total 100 cases were studied. Only those patients presented with extra thyroidal neck masses and who underwent both FNAC & CT procedure were selected for the study. Observation & Results: the highest incidence of neck masses was between age group 41 to 60 years with lymph node enlargement as the commonest mass. In the present study majority of the pathologies were malignant (50%) followed by inflammatory lesions 18%, benign 16% and congenital 16%. The majority of disparity in diagnosis was found in malignant lesions. FNAC revealed more specific diagnosis in case of malignancy. The sensitivity of FNAC was 96.3%, specificity 100% and diagnostic accuracy 96.9%, while CT had sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity 81.8% and diagnostic accuracy 92.3%. Conclusion: FNAC remains an upper hand on CT for diagnosis of extra thyroid neck masses, due to its easy availability, simplicity, low cost, reliability, minimally invasiveness with acceptable sensitivity and few complications. CT is essential in planning surgical approach and predicting prognosis especially in malignant lesions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Muddegowda PH, Srinivasan S, Lingegowda JB, Kurpad R R, Murthy KS. Spectrum of Cytology of Neck Lesions: Comparative Study from Two Centers. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(3): 44-45.

Abariri A, Ahmad SS, Bakshi V. Cytology in the otorhinolarryngologists domain – a study of 150 cases, emphasizing diagnostic utility and pitfalls. Ind J Otolarnyngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 54 (2): 107-10.

Calabrese L, Jereczek – Fossa B, Jassem J, Rocca, A, Bruschini R, Orecchia R, Chiesa F. Diagnosis and management of neck metastases from an unknown primary. ActaOtorhinolaryngologicaltalica. 2005;25(1): 2- 12.

Maharjan M, Hirachan S, Kafle PK, Bista M, Shrestha S, Toran KC, et al. Incidence of tuberculosis in enlarged neck nodes, our experience. KathmanduUniv Med J (KUMJ). 2009;7(25):54-8.

Dejmek A, Lindholmk. Fine needle aspiration biopsy f cystic lesions of the head and neck excluding the thyroid. Acta Cytologica 1990;34(3): 443-448.

Cristallinni EG, Ascani S, Farabi R, Liberati F, Fine needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland. ActaCytologica 1997;41(5):1421-1425.

Cajulis RS, Gokaslan ST, Yu GH, Hidvegi DF. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the salivary glands. A five year experience with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytologica 1997;41(5):1412-1420.

Viguer JM, Vicandi B, Jimenez – Hefferman JA, Lopez – Ferrer P, Linures MA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of pleomorphic adenoma. An analysis of 212 case. ActaCytologica 1997;41(3): 786-794.

Kakimoto N, Gamoh S, Tamaki J, Kishino M, Murakami S, Furukawa S. CT and MR images and minor salivary glands. Eur J Radiol 2009;69:464-72.

Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and neck imaging. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1996.

Lowe LH, Stokes LS, Johnson JE, et al. Swelling at the angle of the mandible: imaging of the pediatric parotid gland and periparotid region. Radiographics. 2001;21:1211-27.

Harnsberger HR. Handbook of head and neck imaging. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1990.

Harriet C. Thoeny. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2007; 7(1): 52-62.

Sus SI, Seol HY, Kim TK et al. Acinic cell carcinoma of the head and neck: radiologicpathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr.2005;29(1): 121-6.

Dutta NN, Baruah R, Das L. Adenoid cystic carcinoma – clinical presentation and cytological diagnosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head and neck Surg. 2002;54(1):62-64.

Rekhi B, Gorad BD, Kakade AC, Chinoy R, “Scope of FNAC in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors – a study from a tertiary cancer referral center in India,” CytoJournal. 2007;4:20.

Benign Musculoskeletal Lipomatous Lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5): 1433-66.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-14

How to Cite

Buch, D. A. ., Kulkarni, D. T. ., Iqbal , D. B. . . . . . . . . . ., Kulkarni, D. V. ., & Dr. Harsh Kumar. (2016). Comparative Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology & Computerised Cytology Scan In Diagnosis of Extra Thyroidal Neck Masses. VIMS Health Science Journal, 3(1), 13–18. Retrieved from https://vimshsj.edu.in/index.php/main/article/view/127

Issue

Section

Articles