Comparison of Scleral Fixated Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation and Posterior Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation In The Treatment of Aphakia With Insufficient Capsular Support

Authors

  • Dr. Snehal Bhalsing
  • Dr. Aesha Desai
  • Dr. Pallavi Ghule

Keywords:

Iris-Claw intraocular lens, Scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens, Visual acuity, Aphakia

Abstract

Aim: To compare the outcome of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) with retro-pupillary fixation of iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) in the treatment of aphakic eyes with insufficient capsular support as regard to the safety, complications and visual outcomes of the procedure. Methodology: A total of 40 patients were divided into 2 equal groups: 20 eyes were implanted with scleral fixated PCIOL and 20 eyes were implanted with iris-claw IOL. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups during the follow up period on day 1,7 days,14 days,1 month and after 3 months. Results: On the first postoperative day, the CDVA ranged from 0.06 to 0.32 in the iris-claw group, with a mean of 0.26 ± 0.108 and it ranged from 0.06 to 0.18 in the scleral fixated group with a mean of 0.12±0.044; there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. After the 3 months post operatively, the CDVA ranged from 0.25 to 0.8 in the iris claw group with a mean of 0.56±0.25 and it ranged from 0.15 to 0.6 in the scleral fixated group with a mean of 0.46±0.16; there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. On the day 1 postoperatively the mean intraocular pressure in the iris claw group was 15.46±2.48 mmHg whereas in scleral fixating IOL group it was 19.24±3.86 mmHg with a statistically difference between 2 groups. Iris claw groups showed higher rates of pupillary distortion, anterior chamber reaction and cystoid macular oedema postoperatively. Whereas corneal oedema, vitreous haemorrhage and retinal detachment were higher in the scleral fixation group. Conclusion: Iris claw IOL implantation can give a significant improvement in vision with fewer complications than SFPCIOL in patients with insufficient capsular support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liesegang TJ, Skuta GL, Cantor LB. Basic and Clinical Science Course: Lens and Cataract. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2007-2008

Improved refractive outcome for ciliary sulcus-implanted intraocular lenses. Dubey R, Birchall W, Grigg J Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb; 119(2):261-5.

Welsh R. Contact lenses in aphakia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1961;1:401.

Beljan J, Beljan K, Beljan Z. Complications caused by contact lens wearing. Coll Antropol. 2013; 1: 179–187.

Burkhard DH, Augustin AJ. Lens implant selection with absence of capsular support. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12: 47–57.

Güell JL, Velasco F, Malecaze F, Vázquez M, Gris O, Manero F. Secondary Artisan-Verysise aphakic lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2266–2271.

Por YM, Lavin MJ. Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(5):429–462.

Gabor SG, Pavlidis MM. Sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber intraocular lens fixation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(11):1851–1854.

Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Jacob S, Baid C, Agarwal A, Srinivasan S. Fibrin glue-assisted sutureless posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in eyes with deficient posterior capsules. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(9):1433–1438.

Kwong YY, Yuen HK, Lam RF, Lee VY, Rao SK, Lam DS. Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:80–85.

Lovisolo CF, Reinstein DZ. Phakic intraocular lenses. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(6):549–587.

Teng H, Zhang H. Comparison of Artisan iris-claw intraocular lens implantation and posterior chamber intraocular lens sulcus fixation for aphakic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014; 7: 283–287.

Hara S, Borkenstein AF, Ehmer A, Auffarth GU. Retropupillary fixation of iris-claw intraocular lens versus transscleral suturing fixation for aphakic eyes without capsular support. J Refract Surg 2011; 27 :729-735.

Farrahi F, Feghhi M, Haghi F, Kasiri A, Afkari A, Latifi M. Iris Claw versus Scleral Fixation Intraocular Lens Implantation during Pars Plana Vitrectomy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2012; 7 :118-124.

Hazar L, Kara N, Bozkurt E, Ozgurhan EB, Demirok A. Intraocular lens implantation procedures in aphakic eyes with insufficient capsular support associated with previous cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 2013; 29 :685-691.

Vote BJ, Tranos P, Bunce C, Charteris DG, Da Cruz L. Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral ?xated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(2):308–312.

Bading G, Hillenkamp J, Sachs HG, Gabel VP, Framme C. Long-term safety and functional outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral-?xated sutured posterior chamber lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(3):371–377.

Menezo JL, Martinez MC, Cisneros AL. Iris-fixated Worst claw versus sulcus-fixated posterior chamber lenses in the absence of capsular support. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; 22 :1476-1484.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-14

How to Cite

Dr. Snehal Bhalsing, Dr. Aesha Desai, & Dr. Pallavi Ghule. (2018). Comparison of Scleral Fixated Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation and Posterior Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation In The Treatment of Aphakia With Insufficient Capsular Support. VIMS Health Science Journal, 5(4), 146–153. Retrieved from https://vimshsj.edu.in/index.php/main/article/view/57

Issue

Section

Articles