A Study of Hand-Sewn Bowel Anastomosis Technique versus Stapler Assisted Bowel Anastomosis Technique In Gastro-intestinal Surgeries

Authors

  • Dr. Karansinh Parve Patil
  • Dr. Sainath Revanwar
  • Dr. Tejashree Junagade
  • Dr. Jayant Gadekar

Keywords:

Bowel anastomosis, Stapler assisted anastomosis, Hand-sewn anastomosis, Linear stapling device, Circular end-to-end anastomosis device, anastomotic leak

Abstract

Background: Both the techniques of anastomosis (hand sewn and stapler assisted) of gastro-intestinal tract are well accepted and well established with their own advantages surgery depends on underlying disease, site of anastomosis and the caliber of bowel. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of both these techniques. Methodology: A retrospective comparative study was done in 95 consecutive cases of gastro-intestinal surgeries involving resection and anastomosis of bowel between January 2017 to May 2018, among which 43 were stapler assisted anastomoses and 52 were hand sewn anastomoses. These surgeries were evaluated for operation time, post-operative anastomotic integrity, return of bowel activity, and length of hospitalization. Results: No significant variation was noted in both the suturing techniques in terms of their outcomes as post-operative anastomotic leakage, and return of bowel activity. However, operation time were significantly reduced in stapler assisted technique than hand sewn technique. Conclusion: Both suturing techniques are more or less equally effective, however, stapler assisted suturing technique significantly reduces the operative timing and less bowel handling and reduced tissue injury, easier at difficult  access sites like deep pelvis, quick to perform. Hence, the implementation of a particular suturing technique in a particular surgery remains solely the surgeons’ choice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bangaru H, Veitla RMR, Pigilam M, Kunwargiri GK. Comparative study between Staplers and Conventional (Hand-Sewn) anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(6): 462-7.

Baily and Love Short Practice of Surgery, 27th edition, page no.97.

Bhandari S, babu NM,Gojanur G, Reddy CK, Comparative study of bowel anastomosis-Hand sewn versus stapler. LOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. (IOSR-JDMS). 2016;15(12):37-42.

Kirk RM, Winslet M. Essential General Surgical Operations. Edinburgh: Churchill livingstone; 2001.

Nichkaode Prabhat, Aditya Parakh. Stapling devices: comparative study of stapled versus conventional hand sewn anastomosis in elective gastrointestinal surgery. International Surgery Journal Sept. 2017;volume 4 Issue 9 page no. 2937.

Suzana Angelica da Silva Lustosa, Delcio Matos, Alvaro Nagib Atallah, Aldemar Araujo Castro. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao paulo Med J/Rev paul Med 2002;120(5): 132-6.

Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, Sanyan S, Agrawal N, Dash NR, et al. Randomized trial comparing side to side stapled and hand sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(7): 1287-95.

Worrell S, Mumtaz S, Tsuboi K, Lee Th, Mittal SK. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis. J surg Res. 2010;161(1): 9-12.

Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(5): 681-5.

Seo SH, Kim KH, Kim MC, Choi HJ, Jung Gj. Comparative study of hand sutured versus circular stapled anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy. J Gastric cancer. 2012; 12(2): 120-5.

Hassanen A, Darwish A, Bieh HA. Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis of the large bowel due to abdominal trauma: a prospective comparative study. Egyptian J Sur. 2008;27(4): 208-12.

Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophaheal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(5): 681-5.

Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee JM, Lee YC. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2004; 25(6): 1097-101.

Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer- a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226(2): 169-73.

Damesha N, Lubana PS, Jain DK, Mathur R. A Comparative study of sutured and stapled anastomosis in gastrointestinal operations. Internat J Surg. 2008;15(2): 8.

Beuran M, Chiotoroiu AL, Chilie A, Morteanu S, Vartic M, Avram M, et al. Stapled versus hand-sewn colorectal anastomosis in complicated colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Surg Clin (Bucur). 2010;105(5): 645951.

Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery; a prospective randomized study. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Br J Surg. 1991; 78(3): 337-41.

Craig SR, walker WS, Cameron EW, Wightman AJ. A Prospective randomized study comparing stapled with hand-sewn oesophagogastric anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996;41(1): 17-19.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-13

How to Cite

Parve Patil, D. K., Revanwar, D. S. ., Junagade, D. T., & Gadekar, D. J. . (2018). A Study of Hand-Sewn Bowel Anastomosis Technique versus Stapler Assisted Bowel Anastomosis Technique In Gastro-intestinal Surgeries. VIMS Health Science Journal, 5(2), 54–60. Retrieved from https://vimshsj.edu.in/index.php/main/article/view/107

Issue

Section

Articles