Comparative Study of Oral Clonidine Versus Intravenous Esmolol In Attenuation of Hemodynamic Changes During Laparoscopic Surgeries

Authors

  • Dr. Hiren R. Senjalia
  • Dr. P. S. Thorat
  • Dr. H. S. Rawat

Keywords:

Clonidine, Esmolol, Laparoscopic surgeries, Pneumoperitonium

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopy is the essence of modern surgery but the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum used there in significantly impairs patients cardiopulmonary function. Both Clonidine and Esmolol are known to inhibit catecholamine and vasopressin release and attenuate hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum. This randomized double blinded study was carried out to assess which agent attenuates hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum better in laparoscopic surgeries. Materials & Methods: A total of 60 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgeries were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received 150?g Clonidine orally 60 minutes before induction. Group A & Group B received 1.5mg/kg of Esmolol IV as a loading dose over a period 5 minute just before induction of GA followed by 10?g/kg/min IV as a maintenance dose throughout the procedure. No hypnotic medication was given on the evening before surgery. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressures and heart rate were recorded at (1) baseline, (2) 3 minutes after endotracheal intubation, (3) before pneumoperitoneum, (4) 15 minutes after pneumoperitoneum , (5) 30minutes after pneumoperitoneum, (6) 5 minutes after release of CO2 and (7) 5 minutes after extubation. Results: Both groups were similar with respect to demographic data. Clonidine group showed more stability in hemodynamic responses than Esmolol group in all hemodynamic variables. Conclusion: Oral Clonidine provides more stability than intravenous Esmolol in laparoscopic surgeries and also it is relatively safe and easy for oral administration with low cost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sharma KC, Brandstetter RD, Brensilver JM, Jung LD. Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest 1996;110:810-5.

Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, Jacquet NJ, Lamy ML. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Anesth Analg 1993;75:1067-71.

Jean LJ. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 2185-202.

Kalra NK, Verma A, Agarwal A, Pandey HD Comparative study of intravenously administered clonidine and magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011:27:344-8.

Koivusalo AM, Scheinin M, Tikkanen I, et al. Effects of esmolol on haemodynamic response to CO2 pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:510-7.

Lentschener C, Axler O, Fernandez H, et al. Haemodynamic changes and vasopressin release are not consistently associated with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in humans. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001:45:527-35

Sung CS, Lin SH, Chan KH, Chang WK, Chow LH, Lee TY. Effect of oral clonidine premedication on perioperative haemodynamic response and postoperative analgesic requirement for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2000;38:23-9.

White PF, Wang B, Tang J, Wender RH, Naruse R, Sloninsky A. The effect of intraoperative use of esmolol and nicardipine on recovery after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97(6/:1633-8.

Booker WM, French DM, Molano PA. Further studies on the acute effects of intra abdominal pressure. Am J Physiol 1947:149:292-8.

Mann C. Boccara G, Pouzeratte Y, Elite J, Serradel Le Gal C, Vergnes C, et al. The relationship among carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, vasopressin release, and hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg 1999;89(2):278–83.

Baratz RA, Karis JH. Blood gas studies during Laparoscopy under general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1969;30:463-4.

Larsen JF, Svendsen FM, Pedersen V. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of pneumoperitoneum on cardiac function and haemodynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2004;91(7):848-54.

Malek J, Knor J, Kurzova A, Lopourova M. Adverse hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and their possible suppression with clonidine premedication.Comparison with intravenous and intramuscular premedication. Roll Chair 1999:78:286-91.

Sung CS, Lin SH, Chan KH, Chang WK, Chow LH,Lee TY. Effect of oral clonidine premedication on perioperative hemodynamic response and postoperative analgesic requirement for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2000;38:23-9.

Yu HP, Hseu SS, Yien HW, Teng YH, Chan KH. Oral clonidine premedication preserves heart rate variability for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:185-90.

Mrinmoy Das, Manjushree Ray, Gauri Mukherjee. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of oral clonidine premedication. Indian J Anaesth 2007;51:205-10.

Kalra NK, Verma A, Agarwal A, Pandey HD. Comparative study of intravenously administered clonidine and magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011:27:344-8.

Topcu 1, Ozturk T, Tasyuz T, et al. The effects of esmolol on anesthetic and analgesic requirement. Turk J Anesth Reanim 2007;35:393-8.

Collard V, Mistraletti G, Taqi A, et al. Intraoperative esmolol infusion in the absence of opioids spares postoperative fentanyl in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. AnesthAnalg 2007;105:1255-62.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-13

How to Cite

Senjalia, D. H. R. ., Thorat, D. P. S., & Rawat, D. H. S. . (2017). Comparative Study of Oral Clonidine Versus Intravenous Esmolol In Attenuation of Hemodynamic Changes During Laparoscopic Surgeries. VIMS Health Science Journal, 4(2), 67–72. Retrieved from https://vimshsj.edu.in/index.php/main/article/view/263

Issue

Section

Articles