Comparison of Antegrade & Retrograde Nailing In Treatment of Diaphyseal Fractures In Humerus In Rural Population

Authors

  • Dr. Deepak Datrange
  • Dr. Nitin Bhalerao
  • Dr. Jayant Thipse
  • Dr. D. B. Naikwade
  • Dr. Vikrant Ghanwat

Keywords:

Humerus fractures, Interlocking nailing, Antegrade & Retrograde nailing

Abstract

Fractures of the humeral shaft account for about 1-3% of all fractures. Conventionally these fractures are treated by conservative methods, which leads to union at the fracture site but patients  have to live with the sequalae of stiff joint and functional disability. Considering these factors we decided to undertake a study to compare the outcome of antegrade & retrograde technique of nailing in fracture shaft humerus in rural population. Study was conducted at department of Orthopaedics, during May 2011 to May 2014. 20 patients with diaphyseal fractures of humerus were treated with interlocking nail by antegrade & retrograde technique. Inclusion criteria: all male & female patients above the age of 20years, fir for surgery. All closed fractures & compound Grade 1 & 2 fractures (transverse, oblique, spiral). Failed conservative methods. Segmental fractures. Observations & Results: time taken for antegrade nailing was  75 minutes & for retrograde nailing was 100 minutes. In antegrade group ROM of shoulder was assessed at the end of 12weeks. 7-10 patients had 120 to 150 degree abduction, 100 -120 degree of flexion, 30-50 degree extension with normal rotations. Conclusion: when indicated internal fixation of fractures of the shaft of humerus with interlocked intramedullary nail gives good results. With proper patient selection antegrade & retrograde nailing have similar treatment results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW. Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996

Diaphyseal Humeral Fractures and Intramedullary Nailing P21-25: Can we Improve Outcome Christos Garnavos ljoo/May 2011/Vol 45/Issue 3 P4-11

Schatzker J, Tile M. The rationale of operative Fracture Care. 1st ed. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer- Verlag Publishers; P72-80

Balfour GW, Mooney V, Ashby ME. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with a ready-made fracture brace. J Bonejoint SurgAm 1982;64:11-3.

Bleeker WA, Nijsten MW, ten Duis HJ. Treatment of humeral shaft fractures related to associated injuries. A retrospective study of 237 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1991;62:148-53.

Campbell’s operative orthopaedics – 9th ed, Mosby publications 1998. P1117-1145.

Cave EH – Fractures and other injuries – Chicago Medical Yearbook 1958. P20-27.

Charnaley J – The closed treatment of the common fractures – 3rd ed: 1961, P26-32

Rommens PM, Verbruggen J, Broos P – Retrograde interlock nailing of fracture of the humeral shaft – a clinical study. Unfallchirurg 1995 Mar; 98(3): 133-8.

Published

2016-03-14

How to Cite

Datrange , D. D. ., Bhalerao, D. N., Thipse, D. J., Naikwade, D. D. B., & Ghanwat, D. V. . (2016). Comparison of Antegrade & Retrograde Nailing In Treatment of Diaphyseal Fractures In Humerus In Rural Population. VIMS Health Science Journal, 3(1), 5–9. Retrieved from https://vimshsj.edu.in/index.php/main/article/view/125

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)